00:00
00:00
Elise-Lucy

43 Audio Reviews

24 w/ Responses

Nice, but still needs some improvements

I kind of like this track - it's very varied, so it doesn't get boring to listen. The things I especially like, are drums in the beginning and pitch-changing notes.
Nonetheless, I still believe, this music needs work - the bass is rather slightly audible (and the song just asks for strong one) and the drums become less interesting after the beginning - they take away the whole power from the music.

Very nice, though simple

Very simple bass and drums combined with a melody which would make a good music for children song. Good job (even though I don't think, it wasn't a big effort to do it).

Satyre responds:

Thanks for the review.

Yes, it was meant to be played in an childish environment.
For the effort: I worked 1-2 hours for this, and i think its pretty much work. I'am not a pro at composing music, so thanks for the high score :)

It's not ambitious

I can notice, this took such a short amount of time. The same sound set repeating over and over again is tiring. However, there are some minor add-ones which save the song from being just bad.

Exaggerated

Playing with pitch is fun, but it's better not to exaggerate it like it was done in this track.
The whole song is quite simple, only the rhytm and leads change. I believe, it would be done much better if it was given more work.

GamekrazzyProduction responds:

Playing with pitch is fun indeed. But really all I did was add an arpeggio effect to a jazzy bass tune, that u actually might recoginze. I created the second part by harmonizing with it. I am glad of ur oppinion. And maybe I will see what I can do about a better version then this. BTW, I really did not exaggerate the pitch. I set the Arpeggio pitch level to 2 as well as repeat to slow it down. I then moved time and the other option just barely. You are right it is simple, but alot of good beats are. Thank you.

It just keeps repeating

Over and over again.
The music itself could be much shorter and it wouldn't lose anything.
It's very dynamic. Maybe not the kind of music, I like, but would be good to dance.
Music is simple, though, but I think, it's usual in this type of tracks.

yeajimmiboi responds:

Yea its quite usual in hardcore really. Thanks for commenting though. P.S. Sorry if I offended you, the guy above you obviously thinks I did. I am not blaming anything on the genre. If people thinks it's shit that's their opinion. Have a good day.

Nothing to be impressed

Nice to hear, though. I's quite simple, but the general track sound relaxing.

Very dynamic

But all in all, simple. Too simple.

23i responds:

This review has become an inside joke in my social circle, we usually use your review as a fun thing to say ones anyone has got something to show us. Thanks for making my day mate.

Simple...

The music is simple and the beats are repeating throughout the whole song. Could be much better.
I don't really like the vocals, but all in all, they aren't too disturbing. The music breaks are much better, however, there is nothing revolutionary in them. It's just another track, like many tracks on the internet.

Cute

Quite relaxing song. I like the way it changes its volume. However, it's sometimes slightly exaggerated. The beginning is very quiet, so I had to turn my speakers up. Then, they exploded with music...
Anyway, the composition itself is amazing.

SolusLunes responds:

I think I may have taken the quiet parts too far. :D Hey, it's all a learning process.

Sounds simple...

I really liked the beginning. I liked how the chords were changing.
Going further, you introduce more and more sounds and after a while, you have nothing more to offer.
The music itself is not bad, but in some moments, the background sounds become too repeating. The sound of strings appears a little annoying at first, but I can get used to it.

Female

Joined on 11/18/09

Level:
3
Exp Points:
50 / 100
Exp Rank:
> 100,000
Vote Power:
2.82 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
2
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
526